I think the system may have issues but Dorner was not right to commit murder. Killing people will not solve the issue but rather create more. However on the other hand if Dorner had not taken the actions he did the case would have not gotten any attention. Dorner would have been just another guy. Maybe there is some method in his madness.
I agree with Kelvie to some extent. Even if the system is corrupt, Dorner have no right to take away other people's lives. His actions were way too extreme; he was targeting all of the people in the police force, many of which are probably good cops. I think if Dorner wanted justice, he could sue the police department or reveal the corruption to the general pulic.
As much as I believe in what he is fighting for, being the mistreatment and corruption by the police force, the main incident causing his anger and madness was the physical abuse of a disabled person. Although it brought attention to the issue, I don't believe killing innocent people (even if they are policemen) is any kind of way to respond when it is an issue of ethics.
Similar to people above, I did not agree with actions of killing policemen which also include innocents for whatever reason he had. It is true that Dorner has been mistreated, but his actions are far more extreme than what they should be. If he wants justice, he could achieve it through leagal means.
I think the system may have issues but Dorner was not right to commit murder. Killing people will not solve the issue but rather create more. However on the other hand if Dorner had not taken the actions he did the case would have not gotten any attention. Dorner would have been just another guy. Maybe there is some method in his madness.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Kelvie to some extent. Even if the system is corrupt, Dorner have no right to take away other people's lives. His actions were way too extreme; he was targeting all of the people in the police force, many of which are probably good cops. I think if Dorner wanted justice, he could sue the police department or reveal the corruption to the general pulic.
DeleteAs much as I believe in what he is fighting for, being the mistreatment and corruption by the police force, the main incident causing his anger and madness was the physical abuse of a disabled person. Although it brought attention to the issue, I don't believe killing innocent people (even if they are policemen) is any kind of way to respond when it is an issue of ethics.
ReplyDeleteSimilar to people above, I did not agree with actions of killing policemen which also include innocents for whatever reason he had. It is true that Dorner has been mistreated, but his actions are far more extreme than what they should be. If he wants justice, he could achieve it through leagal means.
ReplyDelete